﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><StrategicPlan xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.stratml.net http://www.schema-archive.com/xml.gov/stratml/v1r0/cur/StrategicPlan.xsd" xmlns="http://www.stratml.net" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><!--This document transformed using a tool developed by Drybridge Technologies for information navigate to http://www.drybridge.com--><!--The schema posted at http://www.schema-archive.com is provided as a courtesy for on-line validation of various standards. You should verify that the schema provided meets your requirements.--><Name>National Military Strategy of the United States of America</Name><StrategicPlanCore><Organization><Name>National Military Strategy of the United States of America</Name><Acronym>NMS</Acronym><Identifier>_a568d1d0-0c85-4917-bcf9-add39e2616de</Identifier></Organization><Mission><Description>The National Military Strategy (NMS) supports the aims of the National SecurityStrategy (NSS) and implements the National Defense Strategy (NDS). It describes theArmed Forces’ plan to achieve military objectives in the near term and provides thevision for ensuring they remain decisive in the future.</Description><Identifier>_b047c790-4f55-4122-8dd4-9491534256e9</Identifier></Mission><Value><Name>Agility</Name><Description>It is imperative that the Armed Forces retain the ability to contend with theprincipal characteristic of the security environment – uncertainty. Agility is theability to rapidly deploy, employ, sustain and redeploy capabilities in geographicallyseparated and environmentally diverse regions. As commanders conduct operationsthey must consider the effects of surprise and the possibility that their forces mayhave to transition from one type or phase of an operation to another quickly, orconduct phases simultaneously, regardless of location. Agility, as a planningprinciple, allows commanders to conduct simultaneous missions while retaining theability to respond to emerging crises. Agility is key to quickly seizing the initiativeacross the range of military operations and ensuring the Armed Forces can act swiftlyand decisively to protect US interests.</Description></Value><Value><Name>Decisiveness</Name><Description>Decisiveness allows combatant commanders to overwhelm adversaries, controlsituations and achieve definitive outcomes. Decisiveness requires tailored packagesof joint capabilities designed to achieve specific effects and accomplish objectives.Achieving decisiveness may not require large force deployments but rather employingcapabilities in innovative ways. Transforming the Armed Forces’ capacity to masseffects while retaining the ability to mass forces, if needed, is key to achievingdecisiveness. By focusing on decisive outcomes, combatant commanders can moreprecisely define the effects they must generate and determine the capabilities theyrequire.</Description></Value><Value><Name>Integration</Name><Description>Commanders must ensure military activities are integrated effectively with theapplication of other instruments of national and international power to provide focusand unity of effort. Integration focuses on fusing and synchronizing militaryoperations among the Services, other government agencies, the commercial sector, non-governmental organizations and those of partners abroad. Integration does notpreclude the unilateral use of force, but rather seeks to ensure unity of effort andmaximize the contribution of partners. Enabling multinational partners throughsecurity cooperation and other engagement activities enhances the ability of theArmed Forces to not only prevent conflict and deter aggression but also supportscombatant commanders’ plans to quickly undertake operations over great distancesand in sometimes overlapping conflicts.</Description></Value><Goal><Name>Protect the United States</Name><Description>Today, our first priority is to protect the United States. Joint forces help tosecure the United States from direct attack through military activities overseas,planning and execution of homeland defense and support to civil authorities. Ourexperience in the WOT reinforces the fact that protecting the Nation and its globalinterests requires more than passive defensive measures. The threats posed byterrorist groups and rogue states, especially those that gain access to WMD/E,mandate an active defense-in-depth. Achieving this objective requires actions tocounter threats overseas and close to their source; to secure our air, sea, space andland territorial approaches; and at home to defend against direct attacks. Whendirected, the Armed Forces provide military support to civil authorities, includingcapabilities to manage the consequences of an attack.</Description><Identifier>_10aee06c-713c-4a09-ba77-95b8e82f056d</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>A</SequenceIndicator><Objective><Name>Countering Threats Close to their Source</Name><Description>Our primary line of defense remainswell forward. Forces operating in key regions are essential to the defense of theUnited States and to the protection of allies and US interests. Our theater securityactivities with multinational partners provide access to information and intelligencecritical to anticipating and understanding new threats. This access supports theability of the United States to project power against threats and support theestablishment of an environment that reduces the conditions that foster extremistideologies. Our forces, including those rotationally deployed and those stationedforward, will work cooperatively with other nations to encourage regional partners toeliminate threats and patrol ungoverned space. More directly, deployed military unitswill work closely with international partners and other US government agencies totake the battle to the enemy – engaging terrorist forces, terrorist collaborators andthose governments harboring terrorists.</Description><Identifier>_66311e07-b12d-41cd-8dec-6045b3b3463c</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1</SequenceIndicator></Objective><Objective><Name>Protecting Strategic Approaches</Name><Description>The JOC for “Homeland Security” includestasks to protect the United States from direct attack while securing the air, sea, landand space approaches to the United States. We will join the efforts of multinationalpartners and other US government agencies to form an integrated defense of the air,land, sea and space approaches in and around US sovereign territory. Protectingthese strategic approaches requires persistent surveillance that allows the UnitedStates to identify, continuously track and interdict potential threats. This integrateddefense is essential to securing strategic access and retaining US freedom of action.</Description><Identifier>_4b77dbf7-02dd-4ba2-b841-d45d58e6040d</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2</SequenceIndicator></Objective><Objective><Name>Defensive Actions at Home</Name><Description>While we will attempt to counter threats close totheir source and interdict them along the strategic approaches, we must retain theability to defend the United States from an attack that penetrates our forwarddefenses. At home the Armed Forces must defend the United States against air andmissile attacks, terrorism and other direct attacks. As necessary, the Armed Forceswill protect critical infrastructure that supports our ability to project military power.When directed, the Armed Forces will temporarily employ military capabilities tosupport law enforcement agencies during special events. During emergencies theArmed Forces may provide military support to civil authorities in mitigating theconsequences of an attack or other catastrophic event when civilian responders areoverwhelmed. Military responses under these conditions require a streamlined chainof-command that integrates the unique capabilities of active and reserve militarycomponents and civilian responders. Effective defense in the face of adaptiveadversaries will also require the exploitation of future technologies to improvecapabilities to rapidly detect, assess and interdict WMD/E and emerging threats.</Description><Identifier>_59565840-1859-4750-91e1-f4744fa34b0e</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3</SequenceIndicator></Objective><Objective><Name>Creating a Global Anti-Terrorism Environment</Name><Description>In addition to defending theUS homeland and supporting civil authorities, our strategy will diminish theconditions that permit terrorism to flourish. To defeat terrorists we will supportnational and partner nation efforts to deny state sponsorship, support, and sanctuaryto terrorist organizations. We will work to deny terrorists safe haven in failed statesand ungoverned regions. Working with other nations’ militaries and othergovernmental agencies, the Armed Forces help to establish favorable securityconditions and increase the capabilities of partners. The relationships developed inthese interactions contribute to a global antiterrorism environment that furtherreduces threats to the United States, its allies and its interests. For example,intelligence partnerships with other nations can take advantage of foreign expertiseand areas of focus and provide access to previously denied areas. These relationshipsare essential mission components to protecting the United States, contributing todeterrence and conflict prevention, as well as preventing surprise attacks.</Description><Identifier>_0a2e08ee-949b-43fc-8a02-8c2ab442727e</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>4</SequenceIndicator></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name> Required content not provided </Name><Description>dcError: Required content not provided </Description></Goal><Goal><Name>Prevent Conflict and Surprise Attacks</Name><Description>The United States must prevent conflict and surprise attacks through actions thatdeter aggression and coercion while retaining the capability to act promptly indefending the nation. Preventing conflict and deterring aggression rely in large parton an integrated overseas presence. Overseas, US forces permanently based instrategically important areas, rotationally deployed forward in support of regionalobjectives, and temporarily deployed during contingencies convey a credible messagethat the United States remains committed to preventing conflict. These forces alsoclearly demonstrate that the United States will react forcefully should an adversarythreaten the United States, its interests, allies and partners. The United States mustremain vigilant in identifying conditions that can lead to conflict in anticipatingadversary actions and in reacting more swiftly than in the past. The Joint Force willdeploy forward with a purpose – on the ground, in the air, in space and at sea – andwork with other nations to promote security and to deter aggression. Preventingconflict and surprise attacks requires that the Armed Forces take action to ensurestrategic access, establish favorable security conditions and work to increase thecapabilities of partners to protect common security interests.</Description><Identifier>_aa05efe1-4831-4ca1-9511-ad37643e08a2</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>B</SequenceIndicator><Objective><Name>Forward Posture and Presence</Name><Description>Increasing the capabilities of partners and theirwillingness to cooperate in operations that ensure regional security requires anintegrated, global view of our long-term strategy and enhancements to our overseasmilitary posture. Combatant commanders, employing a mix of forward stationed,rotational and temporarily deployed capabilities tailored to perform specific missions,improve our ability to act within and across borders, strengthen the role of partnersand expand joint and multinational capabilities. Posture and presenceenhancements also serve to assure our friends; improve the ability to prosecute theWOT; deter, dissuade and defeat other threats; and support transformation. Thesechanges, developed in anticipation of future threats, help to ensure strategic accessto key regions and lines of communications critical to US security and sustainingoperations throughout the battlespace. Within the process of adjusting our overseaspresence, combatant commanders must develop and recommend postureadjustments that enable expeditionary, joint, and multinational forces to act promptlyand globally while establishing favorable security conditions. The value and utility ofhaving forces forward goes beyond winning on the battlefield. Employing forces ininstances short of war demonstrates the United States’ willingness to lead andencourages others to help defend, preserve and extend the peace.</Description><Identifier>_ee6fcd46-e371-4794-a6fe-5295f2dcd4e4</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1</SequenceIndicator></Objective><Objective><Name>Promote Security</Name><Description>The visible and purposeful presence of US militarycapabilities is an integral part of an active global strategy to ensure security andstability. Military forces engage in security cooperation (SC) activities to establishimportant military interactions, building trust and confidence between the UnitedStates and its multinational partners. These relatively small investments oftenproduce results that far exceed their cost.SC complements other national-level efforts to prevent conflict and promotemutual security interests. These activities encourage nations to develop, modernizeand transform their own capabilities, thereby increasing the capabilities of partnersand helping them to help themselves. SC helps resolve doctrinal employmentdifferences among military counterparts, enhances important intelligence andcommunication linkages and facilitates rapid crisis response. Active SC contributesto stability in key areas of the world while dissuading potential adversaries fromadopting courses of action that threaten stability and security. In this way, wefacilitate the integration of military operations with allies, contribute to regionalstability, reduce underlying conditions that foment extremism and set the conditionsfor future success.</Description><Identifier>_baf078d1-7f15-4b13-9588-fd69aef23eca</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2</SequenceIndicator></Objective><Objective><Name>Deterring Aggression</Name><Description>Deterrence rests on an adversary understanding that theUnited States has an unquestioned ability to deny strategic objectives and to imposesevere consequences in response to hostile or potentially hostile actions. Deterringaggression and coercion must be anticipatory in nature to prevent the catastrophicimpact of attacks using biological, chemical or nuclear weapons on civilianpopulation centers in the United States or in partner nations. The Armed Forceshave the capability to exercise flexible deterrent options (FDOs) with appropriatecombat power to defuse a crisis or force an adversary to reevaluate its courses ofaction. Combatant commanders build upon the capabilities of early arriving FDOs tosupport the swift defeat of an adversary when necessary. Moreover, they employcapabilities to establish favorable security conditions in which other, non-militaryFDOs can succeed.Effective deterrence requires a strategic communication plan that emphasizes thewillingness of the United States to employ force in defense of its interests. Combatantcommander participation is essential in developing a strategic communication planthat conveys US intent and objectives, and ensures the success of the plan bycountering adversary disinformation and misinformation. Such strategiccommunication can help avoid conflict or deescalate tensions among adversaries.The United States requires a broad set of options to discourage aggression andcoercion. Nuclear capabilities continue to play an important role in deterrence byproviding military options to deter a range of threats, including the use of WMD/Eand large-scale conventional forces. Additionally, the extension of a credible nucleardeterrent to allies has been an important nonproliferation tool that has removedincentives for allies to develop and deploy nuclear forces. Deterring aggression by awider range of adversaries requires transforming existing US strategic nuclear forcesinto a new triad composed of a diverse portfolio of capabilities. This new model forstrategic deterrence includes non-nuclear and nuclear strike forces, active andpassive defenses, as well as infrastructure to build and maintain the force.Improvements and enhancements to non-nuclear strike capabilities, informationoperations, command and control, intelligence and space forces will contribute to amore robust and effective deterrent capability. Future advances in targeting andprecision will provide the capabilities necessary to defeat a wider range of targetswhile reducing collateral damage.</Description><Identifier>_61fb2285-07f2-4a82-a9bb-c7fbbda44f7d</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3</SequenceIndicator></Objective><Objective><Name>Preventing Surprise Attacks</Name><Description>Military forces can no longer focus solely onresponding to aggression. The potentially horrific consequences of an attack againstthe United States demand action to secure the Nation from direct attack byeliminating certain threats before they can strike. Deterring threats and preventingsurprise attacks will place increasing demands on intelligence assets, the agility anddecisiveness of the force and the ability to work time-critical issues in the interagencysetting. Preventative missions require shared, “actionable” intelligence, and rules ofengagement that allow commanders to make timely decisions. This decision makingprocess stresses collaboration, speed and responsiveness – key ingredients requiredwhen exploiting time-sensitive opportunities as they arise, especially against mobile,time critical targets. These missions require exacting analysis and synthesis ofintelligence gathered by a combination of capabilities, including human and technicalcollectors. These operations will generally involve coordinated efforts with otheragencies and departments in the US government, placing a premium on informationsharing, intelligence fusion and collaborative planning.</Description><Identifier>_b017ddff-6f1c-4dde-a8a5-24984a319d20</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>4</SequenceIndicator></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Prevail Against Adversaries</Name><Description>When necessary, the Armed Forces will defeat adversaries. Developments in thesecurity environment necessitate a Joint Force that can achieve tactical andoperational success and prevail in a manner that establishes favorable securityconditions and ensures enduring victories. Terrorist attacks demonstrate thatconflict is not limited to geographic borders and that defeating root causes ofterrorism requires a total national effort. The United States will constantly strive toenlist the support of the international community and increase the capabilities ofpartners to contend with common challenges, but will not hesitate to act alone, ifnecessary.</Description><Identifier>_b136f243-54c5-42dd-96dd-091180057627</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>C</SequenceIndicator><Objective><Name>Swiftly Defeat Adversaries</Name><Description>Some operation plans will focus on achieving alimited set of objectives. Commanders’ plans to swiftly defeat adversaries will includeoptions to: alter the unacceptable behavior or policies of states; rapidly seize theinitiative or prevent conflict escalation; deny an adversary sanctuary, defeat hisoffensive capabilities or objectives; and provide support to post-conflict stability. Ineach case, the Joint Force must combine speed, agility and superior warfightingability to generate decisive effects. Moving forces into multiple geographic locationswill require assured strategic access as well as strategic and tactical lift systemsrobust enough to conduct and sustain multiple, simultaneous operations. Swiftlydefeating adversaries in overlapping operations will require the ability to quicklyreconstitute, reconfigure and redeploy forces to conduct another campaign.</Description><Identifier>_24d54193-795b-4f4e-b29c-d089ed791d5b</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1</SequenceIndicator></Objective><Objective><Name>Win Decisively</Name><Description>Where necessary, commanders’ plans will include options torapidly transition to a campaign to win decisively and achieve enduring results. Thecapabilities required for major combat operations must be applicable to the fullspectrum of threats ranging from state to non-state adversaries employing traditionaland/or asymmetric capabilities. A campaign to win decisively will include actions to:destroy an adversary’s military capabilities through the integrated application of air,ground, maritime, space and information capabilities; and potentially removeadversary regimes when directed. Such campaigns require capabilities forconventional warfighting, unconventional warfare, homeland security, stability andpost-conflict operations, countering terrorism and security cooperation activities.</Description><Identifier>_b069bb4c-2010-44f5-9595-eaccf8d4765b</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2</SequenceIndicator></Objective><Objective><Name>Stability Operations</Name><Description>Winning decisively will require synchronizing andintegrating major combat operations, stability operations and significant post-conflictinteragency operations to establish conditions of stability and security favorable tothe United States. The Joint Force must be able to transition from major combatoperations to stability operations and to conduct those operations simultaneously. Atthe operational level, military post-conflict operations will integrate conflicttermination objectives with diplomatic, economic, financial, intelligence, lawenforcement and information efforts. Joint forces will, where appropriate,synchronize and coordinate their operations and activities with international partnersand non-governmental organizations. These missions render other instruments ofnational power more effective and set the conditions for long-term regional stabilityand sustainable development.</Description><Identifier>_caa3d040-92ce-4a55-9a5a-224271eb906e</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3</SequenceIndicator></Objective></Goal></StrategicPlanCore><AdministrativeInformation><PublicationDate>2010-02-08</PublicationDate><Source>http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Mar2005/d20050318nms.pdf</Source><Submitter><FirstName>Arthur</FirstName><LastName>Colman (www.drybridge.com)</LastName><EmailAddress>colman@drybridge.com</EmailAddress></Submitter></AdministrativeInformation></StrategicPlan>