<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<StrategicPlan xmlns="urn:ISO:std:iso:17469:tech:xsd:stratml_core" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:ISO:std:iso:17469:tech:xsd:stratml_core http://xml.govwebs.net/stratml/references/StrategicPlanISOVersion20140401.xsd"><Name>Leveraging Web 2.0 in Government</Name><Description>This study has four important objectives with regard
to understanding how to leverage Web 2.0 for
government-citizen and government-employee
interactions:
1. Understanding social computing as a phenomenon
and the implications for harnessing its
potential for government use
2. Developing a framework for harnessing the
power of Web 2.0 in government and identifying
the critical issues in such uses
3. Understanding the perceptions of citizens in interacting
with government for service provision and
civic engagement in the Web 2.0 environment
4. Identifying the ways in which social computing
engagement and effectiveness can be measured
in Web 2.0 initiatives</Description><OtherInformation>Introduction - 
With the increased penetration of the Internet and
wireless broadband services, and with the increasing
technology readiness of citizens, in the past five
years the breadth of activities that an average citizen
performs online has been steadily increasing (see
Pew Internet and American Life Project at www.
pewinternet.org). The types of activities range from
sending or reading e-mail (92 percent of Internet
users in 2007 engaged in this activity), buying a
product (66 percent), downloading games or videos
(42 percent), to categorizing or tagging online content
(28 percent) and blogging (22 percent).
The United States and other developed countries
have seen a full integration of technology into citizens&#8217;
lives&#8212;an integration that goes beyond the
Internet, through wireless and mobile connectivity
to virtual realms and virtual worlds. Over the past
five years alone, the percentage of U.S. citizens
involved in social networking and virtual community
activities (broadly defined as networking in sites
such as MySpace, Friendster, LinkedIn, and other
special interest sites; reading/creating blogs; instant
messaging; and using Web 2.0 applications) has
doubled to over 30 percent in the general population
(NTRS 2008). For those in their teens and 20s,
this percentage is much higher (64 percent of the
online teens create content online in such sites),
indicating an ever-increasing trend in the use of the
online environment for social networking, exchanging
information, creating and building up content,
and conducting transactions.
Given these trends, it is expected that tomorrow&#8217;s
adult citizens are going to spend a significant amount
of time online for social, commercial, and business
activities, displacing many of the activities and the
time that is now spent offline. This has tremendous
implications for both businesses and governments
as they seek out useful interactions with their customers
and citizens.
Cognizant of these trends, businesses and governments
are already taking a very close look at Web
2.0 and online communities in order to leverage
them for designing and marketing products and services
and for providing customer and citizen service.
This is reflected in the astronomical sums paid for,
or contemplated for, social network sites such as
MySpace and Facebook, highlighting their valuecreation
potential for both businesses and customers.
A recent McKinsey global survey of business executives
(McKinsey 2007) found that more than 75 percent
of the executives plan to maintain or increase
their investments in Web 2.0 technologies including
peer-to-peer networking, social networking, and
web services. Many businesses are also using these
technologies to communicate externally with customers
and business partners, as well as internally
to increase collaborative efforts among employees.
Similar efforts are already ongoing in many government
organizations, highlighting the fact that governments
are not far behind in understanding the
importance of technology and citizen usage trends.
The Web 2.0 initiatives&#8212;podcasts and virtual
worlds&#8212;of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC),
NASA&#8217;s internal social networks and virtual worlds,
and the U.S. intelligence community&#8217;s Intellipedia
are just a few of the recent efforts launched within
the federal government. Many examples have
already emerged from the United Kingdom and
Japan at other levels of the government. While
efforts can be viewed as experimental or leveraging
the low-hanging fruit, it is very important to identify
and understand the nature of Web 2.0 technologies
and their suitability for various enterprise-level
applications, the ways in which government can
leverage these technologies for strengthening the
government-citizen relationship and for intra- and
inter-government use, and the perceptions that citizens
have regarding the use of these technologies
for interacting with governments. Without such an
understanding, there is the potential danger of ignoring
social trends among citizens and thus rendering
governments somewhat irrelevant and reducing
civic engagement with such citizen groups. This
report aims to fill this gap by researching certain
specific issues ...</OtherInformation><StrategicPlanCore><Organization><Name>University of Maryland University College</Name><Acronym>UMUC</Acronym><Identifier>_72cb229e-2d89-11df-af31-14177a64ea2a</Identifier><Description></Description><Stakeholder><Name>Ai-Mei Chang</Name><Description>Professor of Systems Management</Description></Stakeholder></Organization><Organization><Name>University of Maryland</Name><Acronym>UMD</Acronym><Identifier>_72cb24e2-2d89-11df-af31-14177a64ea2a</Identifier><Description></Description><Stakeholder><Name>P. K. Kannan</Name><Description>Director, Center for Excellence in Service</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder><Name>Harvey Sanders</Name><Description>Associate Professor of Marketing, 
The Robert H. Smith School of Business</Description></Stakeholder></Organization><Organization><Name>IBM Center for The Business of Government</Name><Acronym>CTBG</Acronym><Identifier>_72cb262c-2d89-11df-af31-14177a64ea2a</Identifier><Description></Description><Stakeholder><Name>Albert Morales</Name><Description>Managing Partner</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder><Name>Mark Cleverley</Name><Description>Director of Strategy, 
IBM Public Sector Government Transformation</Description></Stakeholder></Organization><Vision><Description></Description><Identifier>_72cb26fe-2d89-11df-af31-14177a64ea2a</Identifier></Vision><Mission><Description>[To encourage and assist] government agencies ... to invest time and effort right now to understand the environment and gain relevant experience working in it to plan for the interaction media and service delivery channel of the future.</Description><Identifier>_72cb27c6-2d89-11df-af31-14177a64ea2a</Identifier></Mission><Value><Name>Online Engagement</Name><Description>Government needs to meet citizens where they are
online. Social computing renders the online environment
individual-user-centric. Younger citizens are
increasingly engaging each other, interacting with
businesses, and building an online cultural and
commercial environment, all of which clearly call
for government initiatives targeting citizens online.
Governments will have to engage citizens at sites
where they are rather than expect them to approach
government portals. Citizens view this as &#8220;keeping
up with the times,&#8221; indicating the inevitability of
such initiatives.</Description></Value><Value><Name>Online Interaction</Name><Description>Citizens are willing to interact with government
agencies online. In general, citizens have positive
attitudes toward potential Web 2.0 initiatives. The
more relevant the uses are for citizens, the more
willing they are to interact with the government on
the specific uses. Appropriately designed initiatives
to engage citizens in their own settings will also
enhance the trust citizens have in their government
and help government build citizen loyalty. Such initiatives
have the potential to increase the transparency
of government agencies, which could lead to
greater trust in them. It could also lead to greater
citizen influence on government policies and
actions.</Description></Value><Value><Name>Intermediary Services</Name><Description>The role of intermediaries will increase. Many businesses
are being aided by third-party firms acting as
intermediaries in providing content and service in
the Web 2.0 environment. It is inevitable that, in
order to engage citizens effectively in their social
computing setting, governments will have to employ
and leverage intermediaries to increase their coverage
and reach to deliver content and &#8220;mashable&#8221;
services. Governments will also be able to provide
customized services to citizens at a potentially
lower cost with the help of intermediaries. The
increased coverage and reach will come at the cost
of decreased control, which means governments
have to relinquish some control over how the content
and service is reconfigured and distributed.</Description></Value><Value><Name>Content and Service Design</Name><Description>Government will need to rethink content and service
design. Web 2.0 applications will necessitate
governments rethinking how they design their content
and services. Content has to be addressable in
a very granular form so that intermediaries can pick
the appropriate content and application they need
to fulfill their service task. Privacy of citizen content
and information has to be defined at a granular level
for the same reason. Similarly, security considerations
may dictate the design of the content and
transportability of content to intermediaries as well
as citizens in their online environment.</Description></Value><Value><Name>Embedded Authority</Name><Description>Government will have to find ways to embed authority
in its web-based services. A survey of government
initiatives and pilots in the Web 2.0 environment
shows that they mainly span communication- and
interaction-focused uses to date. Many citizens have
been exposed to the Web 2.0 environment in an
entertainment and/or social context. There is a level
of informality in such uses that is likely to be associated
with the more formal uses that governments may
plan. Thus, imparting the appropriate level of authority
to government initiatives is critically important to
gain citizen trust in such uses.</Description></Value><Value><Name>Equal Access</Name><Description>Some citizens are concerned about equal access.
The focus group studies indicated that many of the
non-users of Web 2.0 technologies were concerned
that they might be disenfranchised if similar opportunities
were not provided in other more conventional
channels. Equally important is the issue of
access for those who do not have online access.
Thus, there is a danger of some citizens becoming
&#8220;second-class&#8221; citizens based on their abilities and
access.</Description></Value><Value><Name>Trust</Name><Description>Citizens trust the government with personal data
but not for service efficiency. Studies revealed that
citizens trusted government more than businesses
with regard to their personal data and privacy.
However, in terms of service efficiency, citizens
tended to trust the private sector to do a better job.
Given the specific nature of trust, governments can
leverage reputed third-party service providers by
teaming up with them to provide &#8220;mashable&#8221; services
to citizens. It is imperative that government
have appropriate control over private information in
such joint ventures to realize the overall benefits.</Description></Value><Value><Name>Metrics</Name><Description>Government will need to measure the effectiveness
of its Web 2.0 initiatives. Surveys of current measurement
techniques in the Web 2.0 environment in
the private sector show that they are focused on two
dimensions:
&#8226; Measurement of the levels of engagement
&#8226; Measurement of the effectiveness of the
application
Both dimensions are necessary to calibrate the
impact of the initiatives and justify a business case for
their use. While measures of levels of engagement
are useful for initial evaluation of government initiatives,
the ultimate focus should always be on measuring
the value generated for citizens.</Description></Value><Goal><Name>Do It</Name><Description>Just do it. </Description><Identifier>_72cb2898-2d89-11df-af31-14177a64ea2a</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name>Government Agencies</Name><Description></Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Government agencies
should embark on pilot projects to understand
and experiment with social computing in the Web
2.0 environment. Communication-focused uses are
good starting points, ones that will allow agencies to
ramp up slowly based on the experience gained. By
the same token, internally focused uses are lowhanging
fruit. Regardless of the focus, social computing
engagements can be time- and effortintensive.
Agencies should not embark on these
pilots if resources are very limited.</OtherInformation><Objective><Name></Name><Description></Description><Identifier>_72cb29a6-2d89-11df-af31-14177a64ea2a</Identifier><SequenceIndicator></SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name></Name><Description></Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation></OtherInformation></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Issues Inventory</Name><Description>Develop a government-wide inventory of common Web 2.0 issues.</Description><Identifier>_72cb2abe-2d89-11df-af31-14177a64ea2a</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name>Solution Architects</Name><Description></Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>An inventory
of common Web 2.0-related policy issues should be
developed, and agencies need to address these
issues collectively rather than having each agency
individually develop their own solutions. These
issues will likely be related to communications focused
and interaction-focused uses.
This inventory could be done from either inside government&#8212;
for example, in the Office of Management
and Budget&#8217;s Administrator for E-Government and
Information Technology&#8212;or via an external honest
broker such as the Collaboration Project, sponsored
by the National Academy for Public Administration
(www.collaborationproject.org). The issues could
range from technology, legacy systems, cultural
barriers, employee job description changes, and
employee training to security, privacy, and measurement
issues. This report has outlined these issues in
the preceding sections.</OtherInformation><Objective><Name></Name><Description></Description><Identifier>_72cb2bd6-2d89-11df-af31-14177a64ea2a</Identifier><SequenceIndicator></SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name></Name><Description></Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation></OtherInformation></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Strategic Rethinking</Name><Description>Strategically rethink how to deliver on your mission. </Description><Identifier>_72cb2d0c-2d89-11df-af31-14177a64ea2a</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name>Agency Managers</Name><Description></Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder><Name>Program Managers</Name><Description></Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Individual agencies or
major programs should strategically develop service focused
uses that may involve using Web 2.0
approaches to reconfigure their business models or
services in order to more effectively deliver on their
own core missions or outcomes that require collaboration
with other agencies.
This rethinking should be a part of their required
agency-wide strategic planning process and not just
within their technology offices. For example the U.S.
Army&#8217;s recruiting service introduced an online interactive
game, &#8220;Today&#8217;s Army,&#8221; as a recruiting device,
which has become an effective way to recruit new
soldiers (www.todaysmilitary.com). Such a specific
effort could be preceded by focused market research
to appropriately design any such use for the citizen
segment and identify the Web 2.0 environment
where citizens could be targeted.</OtherInformation><Objective><Name></Name><Description></Description><Identifier>_72cb2e42-2d89-11df-af31-14177a64ea2a</Identifier><SequenceIndicator></SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name></Name><Description></Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation></OtherInformation></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Information and Service Components</Name><Description>Reconfigure your Internet information and services to be more component based.</Description><Identifier>_72cb2faa-2d89-11df-af31-14177a64ea2a</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>4</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name>Website Managers</Name><Description></Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>As agencies redesign their websites, they
need to focus on making their services and information
more granular, or component-based, and give
users the ability to use government information in
&#8220;mashups&#8221; with other information sources. For
example, the National Weather Service allows its
weather information to be reconfigured and used by
commercial entities (www.nws.noaa.gov). Along
with the trend in service-oriented architecture (SOA)
and need for reusable service modules in the context
of intermediaries extending the reach of government,
government agencies need to develop policies
to support the handling of such information and service
modules. Given the increased role of reputed
intermediaries in the Web 2.0 environment, government
agencies might well consider leveraging intermediaries
for Web 2.0 initiatives.</OtherInformation><Objective><Name></Name><Description></Description><Identifier>_72cb30fe-2d89-11df-af31-14177a64ea2a</Identifier><SequenceIndicator></SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name></Name><Description></Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation></OtherInformation></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Authenticity</Name><Description>Ensure authenticity of government information and services. </Description><Identifier>_72cb325c-2d89-11df-af31-14177a64ea2a</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>5</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name>NIST</Name><Description></Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Agencies need to
develop strategies and policies whereby they (or
their customers) can ensure the authenticity of government-
generated information and services. This is
important as government begins to &#8220;meet&#8221; citizens
where they are online and as intermediaries begin to
&#8220;mash up&#8221; government data and services. Users
need to be assured that government-provided information
is clearly labeled so they can better judge
the authenticity of the information or service they
are accessing. Developing such an approach may be
a government-wide initiative, possibly led by the
National Institute of Standards and Technology.</OtherInformation><Objective><Name></Name><Description></Description><Identifier>_72cb33c4-2d89-11df-af31-14177a64ea2a</Identifier><SequenceIndicator></SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name></Name><Description></Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation></OtherInformation></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Learning</Name><Description>Learn and keep an open mind.</Description><Identifier>_72cb3536-2d89-11df-af31-14177a64ea2a</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>6</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name>Government Agency Executives</Name><Description></Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>It is important for government agency executives to
recognize that social computing is evolving even as
the Web 2.0 platform morphs into Web 3.0 and
beyond; it is in a perpetual beta state. This calls for
executives to have a learning attitude toward the initiatives
they launch in the social computing environment.
Government agencies should start measuring
the levels of engagement of Web 2.0 uses from day
one and measure the effectiveness of uses through
direct feedback from citizens on a regular basis.
Measures should focus on usefulness, satisfaction,
and trust. Refinements should be implemented
based on these measures. As the environment
evolves, these initiatives will have to change with it.
In conclusion, it is fair to say that the time is now for
government agencies to start the above learning process.
The Web 2.0 environment and its newer, evolving
forms are providing opportunities for government
agencies to have flexible, collaborative, low-cost
operations; provide citizens more personalized service
through multiple channels; and make government
agencies more transparent and accountable to
their citizens. It also has the immense potential to
render democratic governments truly participatory.
Such initiatives also have the power to attract
younger, talented workers to government agencies.
It is time for government agencies to rise to the challenge
and avail themselves of the opportunities in
the Web 2.0 environment.</OtherInformation><Objective><Name></Name><Description></Description><Identifier>_72cb36b2-2d89-11df-af31-14177a64ea2a</Identifier><SequenceIndicator></SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name></Name><Description></Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation></OtherInformation></Objective></Goal></StrategicPlanCore><AdministrativeInformation><StartDate></StartDate><EndDate></EndDate><PublicationDate>2010-03-11</PublicationDate><Source>http://www.businessofgovernment.org/pdfs/ChangReport2.pdf</Source><Submitter><FirstName>Owen</FirstName><LastName>Ambur</LastName><PhoneNumber></PhoneNumber><EmailAddress>Owen.Ambur@verizon.net</EmailAddress></Submitter></AdministrativeInformation></StrategicPlan>