<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<StrategicPlan xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.stratml.net  http://xml.gov/stratml/references/StrategicPlan.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.stratml.net"><id/><Name>FEDERAL CHIEF  INFORMATION  OFFICERS: Reporting to OMB  Can Be Improved by  Further Streamlining  and Better Focusing  on Priorities </Name><Description>What GAO Recommends -- GAO is recommending that OMB, in collaboration with CIOs, ensure a common understanding of priority IT reforms and their reporting requirements and address proposed reporting improvements and challenges. OMB neither agreed nor disagreed with GAO's recommendations, citing concerns 
with, among other things, GAO's survey methodology, stating it did not fully support the report's findings and 
recommendations. GAO believes these concerns are largely unfounded and that its recommendations are still valid.</Description><OtherInformation>Why GAO Did This Study -- 
Federal agencies annually invest over $80 billion on IT. As part of overseeing this spending, OMB directs federal 
CIOs to report on their management of IT in such areas as capital planning and investment management, security, and strategic planning.  GAO was asked to review the usefulness of such CIO reporting requirements. Its objectives were to (1) identify the current IT reporting requirements that agency CIOs are to address for OMB, (2) evaluate the extent to which OMB and agency CIOs use the required information to manage IT, including CIOs' views on the utility of the requirements, and (3) assess any OMB efforts to streamline this reporting. To do so, GAO analyzed OMB memorandums and other guidance to develop a list of CIO requirements and surveyed 24 major 
agency CIOs on how they used the required information to manage IT.  Further, it analyzed OMB documentation and interviewed officials to identify plans to streamline reporting.</OtherInformation><StrategicPlanCore><Organization><Name>United States Government Accountability Office</Name><Acronym>GAO</Acronym><Identifier>_c090eb6a-92df-11df-b499-6b157a64ea2a</Identifier><Description/><Stakeholder><Name>OMB</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder><Name>CIOs</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder><Name>David A. Powner</Name><Description>Director, Information Technology Management Issues</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder><Name>GAO Staff</Name><Description>In addition to the individual named above, the following staff made key 
contributions to this report: </Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder><Name>Gary Mountjoy</Name><Description>Assistant Director</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder><Name>Scott  Borre</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder><Name>Chris Businsky</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder><Name>Valerie Hopkins</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder><Name>Stuart Kaufman</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder><Name>Lee McCracken</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder><Name>Tarunkant Mithani</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder><Name>Teresa Smith</Name><Description/></Stakeholder></Organization><Vision><Description/><Identifier>_a78e7818-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier></Vision><Mission><Description>To ensure the usefulness of CIO reporting requirements.</Description><Identifier>_a78e7a0c-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier></Mission><Value><Name/><Description/></Value><Goal><Name>IT Streamlining &amp; Management</Name><Description>To improve the effectiveness of OMB streamlining efforts and ensure 
agency CIOs are better able to carry out their responsibilities in managing 
IT.</Description><Identifier>_a78e7ae8-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator/><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>To improve the effectiveness of OMB streamlining efforts and ensure 
agency CIOs are better able to carry out their responsibilities in managing 
IT, including implementing OMB’s IT reform initiatives, we recommend the 
Director of OMB direct the Federal CIO, in collaboration with agency 
CIOs, to take the following four actions:</OtherInformation><Objective><Name>Priorities</Name><Description>Ensure there is a common understanding with agency CIOs on the 
priority of the current reporting requirements and related IT reform 
initiatives.</Description><Identifier>_a78e7bba-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>This should include addressing underlying reasons cited by 
CIOs regarding the usefulness of requirements, including when 
department priorities are reportedly different than OMB’s and the 
burdensome and duplicative nature of requirements.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Requirements</Name><Description>Address and incorporate the improvements to reporting requirements proposed by agency CIOs.</Description><Identifier>_a78e7c82-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Address and incorporate, as appropriate, the 13 proposed 
improvements to reporting requirements made by agency CIOs in our 
survey. This should include developing milestones and associated 
plans for completing this effort.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Exhibit 300</Name><Description>Change what information is reported</Description><Identifier>_a78e7d4a-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Remove data elements that do not add value (i.e., only what OMB really 
needs or uses to make decisions) or do not provide value in 
monitoring/oversight of investments.
Limit changes to what is included in exhibit 300 to allow for comparisons 
and trending over years.
Remove data that are already reported elsewhere (e.g., 
contract/acquisition information, which is reported through the Federal 
Procurement Data System).
Allow for reporting on investment components</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Exhibit 53</Name><Description>Change what information is reported</Description><Identifier>_a78e7e08-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Remove data elements that do not add value (i.e., only what OMB really 
needs or uses to make decisions) or are no longer relevant.
Agencies should be given the option to only provide an update if a change 
occurs.
Should reflect only agency-received funding and support the request for 
funding (should not be used as a catch-all for other data collection).</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Annual Federal Information Security Management Act Report</Name><Description>Change what information is reported</Description><Identifier>_a78e7f02-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Remove data elements that do not add value (i.e., only what OMB and the 
Department of Homeland Security really need or use to make decisions), 
do not provide value in monitoring/oversight of security (i.e., those that do 
not provide useful performance metrics), or are not related to what is 
required under the law.
Remove questions that duplicate information collected through other 
mechanisms on a more frequent basis.
Reporting guidance needs to be published earlier.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Cost Savings/Avoidances</Name><Description>New frequency of reporting</Description><Identifier>_a78e7fca-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.4</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Change from quarterly to annually.
Move to annual reporting to help limit the number of changes that OMB 
makes to what information should be reported throughout the year.
Calculating savings and avoidances for these types of activities is not 
appropriate on a quarterly basis due to the time involved in transitioning 
resources</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Commodity IT Baseline Updates</Name><Description>New frequency of reporting</Description><Identifier>_a78e8088-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.5</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Change from quarterly to semi-annually.
Move to semi-annual reporting to help reduce (1) the burden of reporting 
data that change very little from one quarter to the next, and (2) the effort 
required to manually enter the data into the MAX Portal.
Should align or be consolidated with the annual exhibit 53 process.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>PortfolioStat Progress Report</Name><Description>New frequency of reporting</Description><Identifier>_a78e8150-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.6</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Change from quarterly to either semi-annually or annually.
Should be a frequency that is agreed upon between OMB and the agency. </OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Cloud First</Name><Description>New frequency of reporting</Description><Identifier>_a78e8218-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.7</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Change from quarterly to either semi-annually or annually.
Should align with reporting of other initiatives with related goals and the 
exhibit 53 process.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Open Data Policy Publication Process</Name><Description>New frequency of reporting</Description><Identifier>_a78e82d6-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.8</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Change from quarterly to annually.
Should align with reporting of other initiatives with related goals.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Open Government Directive</Name><Description>Consolidate or combine with other requirements</Description><Identifier>_a78e83b2-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.9</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Consolidate with other Open Data policy reporting and/or Digital 
Government Strategy.
Consolidate to be included in Agency Strategic Plan and/or Enterprise 
Roadmap</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Major IT Investment Documentation</Name><Description>Eliminate requirement</Description><Identifier>_a78e847a-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.10</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Provides no value to the agency’s management of IT, and it is not clear 
what value agencies would gain from OMB feedback.
OMB has not clarified why it is collecting this information or how it will be 
utilized.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>IT Capital Plan</Name><Description>Eliminate requirement</Description><Identifier>_a78e854c-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.11</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>OMB has not requested this information for recent submissions.
Information is reported elsewhere in other requirements.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>E-Government Status Report</Name><Description>Eliminate requirement</Description><Identifier>_a78e8632-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.12</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Provides no value to the agency’s management of IT.
Some data elements are reported elsewhere in other requirements or 
through other mechanisms. </OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Compliance Failures</Name><Description>Eliminate requirement</Description><Identifier>_a78e86fa-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.13</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Agencies have not provided this information in recent years, and OMB has 
not requested this information.
Information is reported elsewhere in other requirements.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Feedback &amp; Response</Name><Description>Ensure the feedback process on information reported by CIOs consistently provides effective and constructive responses to these officials on their reported information.</Description><Identifier>_a78e87d6-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Challenges</Name><Description>Assess reporting challenges.</Description><Identifier>_a78e88b2-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>4</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Assess, as part of ongoing streamlining efforts, the reporting 
challenges identified in our report. This should include determining 
whether to (1) have a comprehensive list of current IT reporting 
requirements that is publically available to agency CIOs; (2) reduce 
the number of reporting tools; and (3) improve the utility of capital 
planning and investment reporting requirements, and taking steps to 
implement where appropriate.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Public Listing</Name><Description>Determine whether to have a comprehensive list of current IT reporting 
requirements that is publicly available to agency CIOs.</Description><Identifier>_a78e8984-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>4.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Reporting Tools</Name><Description>Determine whether to reduce the number of reporting tools.</Description><Identifier>_a78e8b50-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>4.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Capital Planning &amp; Investment</Name><Description>Determine whether to improve the utility of capital planning and investment reporting requirements.</Description><Identifier>_a78e8c4a-da78-11e4-93cc-873e558cc3bd</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>4.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective></Goal></StrategicPlanCore><AdministrativeInformation><StartDate>2015-04-01</StartDate><EndDate/><PublicationDate>2015-04-03</PublicationDate><Source>http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/669434.pdf</Source><Submitter><FirstName>Owen</FirstName><LastName>Ambur</LastName><PhoneNumber/><EmailAddress>Owen.Ambur@verizon.net</EmailAddress></Submitter></AdministrativeInformation></StrategicPlan>